U.S. Threatens to Cut UNRWA Funding After Palestinians Reject U.S. Peace Push – UN Watch

A Palestinian woman takes part in a protest against possible reductions of the services and aid offered by United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), in front of UNRWA headquarters in Gaza City August 16, 2015.. (photo credit: REUTERS/MOHAMMED SALEM)

Time Line of Events Leading up to U.S. Threat to Cut UNRWA Funding

Dec. 6, 2017 – Trump issues statement officially recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital: “But today, we finally acknowledge the obvious: that Jerusalem is Israel’s capital.  This is nothing more, or less, than a recognition of reality.  It is also the right thing to do.  It’s something that has to be done.”

Trump was clear not to predetermine the boundaries of Israeli Jerusalem, saying this is a final status issue to be decided by the parties in negotiations—“In making these announcements, I also want to make one point very clear:  This decision is not intended, in any way, to reflect a departure from our strong commitment to facilitate a lasting peace agreement.  We want an agreement that is a great deal for the Israelis and a great deal for the Palestinians.  We are not taking a position of any final status issues, including the specific boundaries of the Israeli sovereignty in Jerusalem, or the resolution of contested borders.  Those questions are up to the parties involved.”

While Netanyahu hailed the announcement as a “historic landmark,” it was widely criticized by world leaders. PA President Mahmoud Abbas said it “undermine[s] all peace efforts. Hamas leader Ismail Haniya called to launch an Intifada against “the Zionist enemy.” Western leaders also criticized the statement. EU foreign policy chief Frederica Mogherini said the announcement “has a very worrying potential impact.” French President Emmanuel Macron called it “regrettable.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel and UK Prime Minister Theresa May came out publicly against the announcement.

Dec. 18, 2017 – The US uses its veto to block an Egyptian sponsored resolution intended to reverse Trump’s Jerusalem announcement at the UN Security Council. All other security Council members support the resolution.

Ambassador Nikki Haley delivers two speeches at that meeting. In her first speech she harshly criticizes UN Security Council resolution 2334 adopted in December 2017, calling it “an impediment to peace” because it “misplaced the blame for the failure of peace efforts squarely on Israeli settlements,” giving “a pass to Palestinian leaders who for many years rejected one peace proposal after another,” and prejudged final status issues. By contrast, Trump’s announcement did not prejudge final status issues, she says.

In her second speech explaining the U.S. vote, Haley defended the U.S. announcement as a matter of sovereignty and emphasized the leading role played by the U.S. in supporting the Palestinians. “The United States has done more than any other country to assist the Palestinian people. By far. Since 1994, we have given over $5 billion to the Palestinians in bilateral economic assistance, security assistance, and humanitarian assistance… Last year, the United States voluntarily funded almost 30% of UNRWA’s budget. That’s more than the next two largest donors combined. And it’s vastly more than some of the members of this Council that have considerable financial resources of their own.” Haley castigated the other members of the Security Council saying “What we witnessed here today in the Security Council is an insult. It won’t be forgotten.”

Dec. 21, 2017 – Following the U.S. veto in the Security Council, the resolution is presented to an emergency special session of the General Assembly on December 21. It is adopted by a vote of 128 to 9 with 35 abstentions and 21 no-shows.

In advance of the vote, Haley warns countries against criticizing U.S. sovereignty in Twitter and Facebook posts: “At the UN we’re always asked to do more & give more. So, when we make a decision, at the will of the American ppl, abt where to locate OUR embassy, we don’t expect those we’ve helped to target us. On Thurs there’ll be a vote criticizing our choice. The US will be taking names.”

In her speech at that special session, Ambassador Haley says “this vote will be remembered” for other countries’ disrespect of the United States. Haley rebukes those countries, stating: “But we’ll be honest with you. When we make generous contributions to the UN, we also have a legitimate expectation that our good will is recognized and respected. When a nation is singled out for attack in this organization, that nation is disrespected. What’s more, that nation is asked to pay for the “privilege” of being disrespected.”

Jan. 2, 2018 – At a press conference at UN Headquarters in New York, Ambassador Haley responds to a question on whether the U.S. would continue to provide funding to UNRWA: “I think the president has basically said that he doesn’t want to give any additional funding until the Palestinians are agreeing to come back to the negotiation table… We’re trying to move for a peace process but if that doesn’t happen the president is not going to continue to fund that situation.”

Jan. 2, 2018 – The U.S. holds back a pre-scheduled $120 million disbursement to UNRWA.

Jan. 3, 2018 – In a pair of Tweets in the early morning hours on January 3, 2018, President Trump threatens to cut U.S. aid to the Palestinians. He tweeted:

“It’s not only Pakistan that we pay billions of dollars to for nothing, but also many other countries, and others. As an example, we pay the Palestinians HUNDRED OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS a year and get no appreciation or respect. They don’t even want to negotiate a long overdue… peace treaty with Israel. We have taken Jerusalem, the toughest part of the negotiation, off the table, but Israel, for that, would have had to pay more. But with the Palestinians no longer willing to talk peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?”

Jan. 3, 2017 – Ambassador Nikki Haley hosts a reception for 64 “Friends of the US” countries who did not support UN Jerusalem resolution at the GA.

Jan. 5, 2017 – UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness says “We are seeing the reports on this matter [U.S. withholding funds to the agency] but have not been informed directly of a formal decision either way by the U.S. administration.”

Jan. 7, 2018 – Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu says at the weekly Cabinet meeting: “I completely agree with President Trump’s sharp criticism of UNRWA. UNRWA is an organization that perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem, and perpetuates also the narrative of the so-called right of return, whose goal is the elimination of Israel. For these reasons, UNRWA should be shut down.”

Netanyahu recommends a gradual approach, saying: “I have a simple suggestion: UNRWA’s aid money should be transferred gradually to the UNHCR, which has clear criteria for supporting true refugees, and not the fake refugee status we have today under UNRWA… I have expressed this position to the United States. This is the proper way to shut down UNRWA and to ensure that real refugee problems are cared for, should any remain [once UNHCR criteria for recognizing refugees are applied to the Palestinians].”

Key Resources

Supporting UNRWA

Criticizing  UNRWA

Other News Articles

Author: unwatch